Report of 2 day workshop on "Python for scientific computing" conducted at Haldia Institute of Tecnology, Haldia from 07 Jul 2010 to 08 Jul 2010.
Around 43 faculty and 15 students attended the workshop.
- Range of topics covered:
- 14 out of 36 people felt that the range of topics covered was very relevant
- 20 out of 36 people felt that the range of topics covered was relevant
- 1 out of 36 people felt that the range of topics covered was somewhat relevant
- Depth of coverage:
- 3 out of 36 people felt that the depth of coverage was too detailed
- 29 out of 36 people felt that the depth of coverage was detailed
- 4 out of 36 people felt that the depth of coverage was not detailed enough
- Effectiveness of methodology:
- 14 out of 36 people felt that the teaching methodology was extremely effective
- 21 out of 36 people felt that the teaching methodology was effective
- Pace of coverage:
- 3 out of 36 people felt that the the pace of coverage was too fast
- 12 out of 36 people felt that the the pace of coverage was fast
- 21 out of 36 people felt that the the pace of coverage was just right
- Applicability:
- 10 out of 36 people felt that they can apply what they have learnt immediately
- 22 out of 36 people felt that they can apply what they have learnt somewhat immediately
- 4 out of 36 people felt that they cannot apply what they have learnt immediately
- Choice of problems:
- 10 out of 36 people felt that the problems were very interesting
- 22 out of 36 people felt that the problems were interesting
- 4 out of 36 people felt that the problems were somewhat interesting
- Choice of Exercises:
- 12 out of 36 people felt that the exercises were very instructive
- 23 out of 36 people felt that the exercises were instructive
- 1 out of 36 people felt that the exercises were somewhat instructive
- General comments:
- The course is effective but too fast to follow
- It should be effective to solve scientific and technological simulations based problems.
- too fast to follow properly. Approach to lern the python is very good.It is somewhat difficult to follow who don't know C/C++.
- This type of workshop will help both the students and techers for their future aspect.
- thank you giving idea over new language
- Encouraging and good for students and faculty members
- good.....
- it was awesome
- it was very nice and helpful for us. the topics covered were useful. hope to participate in such type of workshops later on....thanks a lot..!!
- Nice
- got very much to learn in very less time
- Over all every thing is going very nice. Expecting much more interesting matters to be covered.
- it is required that the course should run at slow speed. because it is easy to understand for CSE or IT students or professional very quickly. but for other branches, it requires time to understand.
- this workshop make me understand python
- i have not more knowledge about any programing language. but it will be helpful for future.
- some topics where covered very fast but overall it was good
- Its awesome!!!
- It was too fast.
- more widely learning session and more detailed work needed
- for the first i have attended this kind of workshop....so i m happy and gaining from it.
- All is good
- Thank you.
- Thank you
It will be very helpful to use this opensource.
just I have to go through a little practice and I think I can use of its all sweet fruits. - It will be beneficial for us to delivere the lecture little slow
- Nicely represented and knowlegable and quite interesting
- very much beneficial. we would have gained more if classes would have been extendedmore.
- The topics covered are very interesting but fast.Giving more time to participant like me will be helpful to learn..
- It is good enough to further implimentation, though it is in very initial stage of learning.
- It is a nice tool, to learn, but time allocation is too small. One needs extra hours to really appreciate the beauty of python.
- This kind of computing software is very effective for many computational problems. This will help me in my research work.
- this type of workshop fist time i m attending and i hope i must be success
- Range of topics covered:
- 8 out of 17 people felt that the range of topics covered was very relevant
- 8 out of 17 people felt that the range of topics covered was relevant
- Depth of coverage:
- 6 out of 17 people felt that the depth of coverage was too detailed
- 9 out of 17 people felt that the depth of coverage was detailed
- 1 out of 17 people felt that the depth of coverage was not detailed enough
- Effectiveness of methodology:
- 7 out of 17 people felt that the teaching methodology was extremely effective
- 9 out of 17 people felt that the teaching methodology was effective
- Pace of coverage:
- 3 out of 17 people felt that the the pace of coverage was too fast
- 7 out of 17 people felt that the the pace of coverage was fast
- 6 out of 17 people felt that the the pace of coverage was just right
- Applicability:
- 4 out of 17 people felt that they can apply what they have learnt immediately
- 12 out of 17 people felt that they can apply what they have learnt somewhat immediately
- Choice of problems:
- 6 out of 17 people felt that the problems were very interesting
- 9 out of 17 people felt that the problems were interesting
- 1 out of 17 people felt that the problems were somewhat interesting
- Choice of Exercises:
- 7 out of 17 people felt that the exercises were very instructive
- 8 out of 17 people felt that the exercises were instructive
- 1 out of 17 people felt that the exercises were somewhat instructive
- General comments:
- No comments!
I know how you guys are..
Going according to you guys' theory of life...I also might be among you someday!!
:-) - allover its really very nice.we r thankful for this...all d best ...
- workshop was intersting and make me learn a lot about python
- very good.
- awesome!!!!!!!!!!!!!
- Really very interactive session
- good
- the workshop was too fast. it should be somewhat slow!!!
- No comments!