The following are the statistics obtained from the audience after the IIIT Hyderabad workshop conducted from 09 February to 10 February 10:

1. Range of topics covered:
   • 16.1% of the people felt that the range of topics covered were very relevant.
   • 69.4% of the people felt that the range of topics covered were relevant.
   • 14.5% of the people felt that the range of topics covered were somewhat relevant.
2. Depth of coverage
   • 16.1% of the people felt that the depth of coverage was too detailed.
   • 70.9% of the people felt that the depth of coverage was detailed.
   • 12.9% of the people felt that the depth of coverage was not detailed enough.
3. Effectiveness of methodology
   • 17.74% of the people felt that the teaching methodology was extremely effective.
   • 74.19% of the people felt that the teaching methodology was effective.
   • 8.06% of the people felt that the teaching methodology was not very effective.
4. Pace of coverage
   • 14.5% of the people felt that the the pace of coverage was too fast.
   • 35.4% of the people felt that the the pace of coverage was fast.
   • 50% of the people felt that the pace of coverage was just right.
5. Applicability
   • 22.67% of the people felt that they can apply what they have learnt immediately.
   • 45.33% of the people felt that they can apply what they have learnt somewhat immediately.
   • 32% of the people felt that they cannot apply what they have learnt immediately.
6. Choice of Problems:
   • 20.97% of the people felt that the problems were very interesting.
   • 61.30% of the people felt that the the problems were interesting.
   • 14.51% of the people felt that the problems were somewhat interesting.
   • 3.22% of the people felt that the problems were not interesting.
7. Choice of Exercises:
   • 16.2% of the people felt that the exercises were very instructive.
   • 75.5% of the people felt that the exercises were instructive.
   • 8.2% of the people felt that the exercises were somewhat instructive.

General Comments
1. Sessions were quite interactive and Interesting. Enjoyed learning . Thank you.
2. Relevant examples from biological data should have been included.
3. I am really glad that I am part of this workshop. I got to revise on things and concepts I learnt during my schooling and college days, but also from a application point of view.
4. I enjoyed this session fully and think ti's going to be helping me a lot in future in learning and using math and physics.
5. The workshop is very informative. function or library construct usage should in details.
6. The workshop is very informative.
7. No comments
8. Need the basic information on python and ipython.
9. Good work!
10. It would be good if the workshop was 4-6 days long so we could learn in depth.
11. Excellent
12. May be some more examples other than mathematics? Computational problems?
13. First give the material of fundamentals and then start the course.
14. Very good approach, but can be more detailed for beginners like us.
15. It is a very good interactive session.
16. Workshop is pretty good especially with the enthusiasm and energy professor teaches us is incredible.
17. Effective use of teaching python by recommended speakers especially to science problems. Well done sir!!
18. Stimulating session
19. It's a good experience
20. 75% of the material or content of the workshop are going to be very useful. Instructors made it very instructive as a result it was a continuous learning of more than 7 hrs.
21. Make the session a little long enough so that there is no rush to finish the topic and the pace of coverage to be reduced.
22. Programming language is good but can't be learnt in 2 days even though they are basics.
23. We cannot learn whole python in two days but teaching is good.
24. It's nice.
25. Nice coverage of topics at a fine pace.
26. Good intro to the language.
27. good coverage & interaction
28. It would have been better if everyone were arranged in a single hall. It was also too fast.
29. Please do not discriminate between professionals/lecturers and students. Every one can be taught in a single conference hall.
30. Superb. Thanks a lot.
31. Better to provide material prepared generally.
32. Coverage of the topics are relevant, easy to understand. but the pace of coverage is fast.
33. Second half session could have been covered bit slowly with more no. of examples by applying to control systems.
34. Good and interesting.
35. Very good.
36. Very useful for us.