The following are the statistics obtained from the audience after the BPRIM workshop conducted on 10 and 11 Oct 09:
Day 1
- Range of topics covered:
- 51.5% of the people felt that the range of topics covered were very relevant.
- 45.3% of the people felt that the range of topics covered were relevant.
- Depth of coverage
- 90.6% of the people felt that the depth of coverage was detailed.
- Effectiveness of methodology
- 28.1% of the people felt that the teaching methodology was extremely effective.
- 65.6% of the people felt that the teaching methodology was effective.
- Pace of coverage
- 12.5% of the people felt that the pace of coverage was too fast.
- 78.5% of the people felt that the the pace of coverage was fast.
- 9.3% of the people felt that the pace of coverage was just right.
- Applicability
- 51.6% of the people felt that they can apply what they have learnt immediately.
- 42.2% of the people felt that they can apply what they have learnt somewhat immediately.
- Choice of Problems:
- 45.3% of the people felt that the problems were very interesting.
- 48.4% of the people felt that the the problems were interesting.
- Choice of Exercises:
- 32.8% of the people felt that the exercises were very instructive.
- 65.6% of the people felt that the exercises were instructive.
General Comments
1. Good
2. I think the session should be split into two. One for python and the other of scientific programming.
3. Tells detail application of Python in IT perspective
4. Teacher had come to show cleverness than to teach
5. It was indeed a very good workshop. Great Arrangement. Great faculty. It kept me involved in learning without getting bored or so.. Really Hats Off!! [Pace of Coverage - It was 'normal']
6. 2 days not sufficient, but it will give us more if days will extend and followup required after workshop
7. The best training workshop I've attended. Absolutely fabulous.
8. The initiative of this program and Presentation of the program is Good.
9. Useful & illustrative
10. Learning a language along with we doing actual implementation was the best thing. Learned lot & immediately.
11. Please make it some what slower so that understanding may be perfect.
12. Good.
13. Its a very good initiative
14. Very useful for me.
15. The method of making students to think is good. The choice of problems is very good as they push the subject right home.
16. A good one to know the basics in a quick session.
17. Nice Program! Fossee. Thanx ....
18. Just, Thank you!
19. Good workshop. Thank you! :-)
20. Structure of python be explained initially viz. library files, modules etc. Comparison with C/C++/C# will be helpful.
21. Its really effective and useful workshop.
22. Very Helpful
23. Interesting and informative session
24. Some more soft material.
25. Good
26. V.Good workshop
27. The discussions are useful.
Day 2
- Range of topics covered:
- 35.4% of the people felt that the range of topics covered were very relevant.
- 56.25% of the people felt that the range of topics covered were relevant.
- Depth of coverage
- 89.6% of the people felt that the depth of coverage was detailed.
- 10.4% of the people felt that the depth of coverage was not detailed enough.
- Effectiveness of methodology
- 14.6% of the people felt that the teaching methodology was extremely effective.
- 79.2% of the people felt that the teaching methodology was effective.
- Pace of coverage
- 14.6% of the people felt that the pace of coverage was too fast.
- 70.8% of the people felt that the the pace of coverage was fast.
- 14.6% of the people felt that the pace of coverage was just right.
- Applicability
- 22.9% of the people felt that they can apply what they have learnt immediately.
- 60% of the people felt that they can apply what they have learnt somewhat immediately.
- 14.6% of the people felt that they cannot apply what they have learnt immediately.
- Choice of Problems:
- 37.5% of the people felt that the problems were very interesting.
- 54.2% of the people felt that the the problems were interesting.
- Choice of Exercises:
- 14.6% of the people felt that the exercises were very instructive.
- 66.7% of the people felt that the exercises were instructive.
- 14.6% of the people felt that the exercises were somewhat instructive.
General Comments
1. Useful sessions.
2. Some matter were interesting to know.
3. Can you arrange workshop for JAVA or any other object oriented language mostly used in industry and research.
4. Can you arrange seminar on research in aeronautical or other stuff.
5. Nice program! keep going on! Thanks.
6. The sessions were very informative.
7. Discussions were useful.
8. Nothing specific.
9. Bit fast for novice with less practical examples.
10. Thanks for fossee team.
11. Thank you!!!
12. At last got introduced to "The Powerful Language" and very much impressed with utilities available in it.
13. Need more time to cover this subject.
14. Good.
Feed back we got for various questions:
15. The best training workshop I have attended.
16. Instead of explaining single person you can give some load to others also. But all things I like very much. Its really amazing/interesting.
Division of Participants
| Days | Teachers | Students | Corporates | Unspecified | Total |
| Day 1 | 11 | 30 | 3 | 20 | 64 |
| Day 1 | 10 | 30 | 8 | 0 | 48 |